Hall of Shame.
Hall of Fame.
The best and the most-cooked vibe-coded launches, ranked by WeVibe score. Updated live.
Hall of Shame
Lowest vibe scores. Sorry.
- 1
nexomind.ai
“This page has the emotional range of a loading screen: title, tagline, and a promise that AI will understand your inner world in seconds. For a journaling app about clarity, it somehow forgot to explain itself, show a CTA, or prove it exists beyond the meta description.”
50
/100
- 2
example.com
“This is less a landing page and more a beige waiting room with DNS. The copy is clear, but it has the emotional range of a printer manual. “Learn more” is doing all the conversion work here, and it brought a folding chair.”
58
/100
- 3
bridgemind.ai
““Ship softwareat the speed of thought” is bold, mostly because the spacebar didn’t ship. The page has real traction with 13,200 Discord members and 86,000 YouTube subs, but then buries it under a fog machine of “vibe coding,” “agentic,” BridgeSpace, BridgeSwarm, BridgeMCP, and a demo that reads like a terminal had a panic attack. “Stop typing.Start shipping” is less a CTA than a cry for kerning help.”
72
/100
Hall of Fame
Actually shipped something clean.
- 1
bridgemind.ai
“Security is clean, so the crime scene is pure copy: “Ship softwareat the speed of thought” forgot the space while promising telepathy. The page says vibe coding so many times it starts feeling like a legally binding incense subscription, then flexes Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Windsurf, and OpenClaw on loop like a NASCAR jacket for agents. Strong social proof, but the hero needs one sharper promise, not a swarm of buzzwords opening PRs.”
74
/100
- 2
example.com
“This is less a landing page and more a beige waiting room with DNS. The copy is clear, but it has the emotional range of a printer manual. “Learn more” is doing all the conversion work here, and it brought a folding chair.”
58
/100
- 3
nexomind.ai
“This page has the emotional range of a loading screen: title, tagline, and a promise that AI will understand your inner world in seconds. For a journaling app about clarity, it somehow forgot to explain itself, show a CTA, or prove it exists beyond the meta description.”
50
/100